United States Army to live by the Army values. Army fraternization policies are contained in Army Regulation , Army Command Policy the two articles are Article 92 and Article The Army fraternization policy 's definition is that relationships between soldiers of different rank are prohibited if they Compromise, or appear to compromise, the integrity of supervisory authority or the chain of command. Cause actual. The Importance of Communication with your Chain of Command Communication is the foundation for sharing information between people to ensure that everything is understood and the correct action can be taken in a timely manner.
Good communication is essential to complete the mission at hand.
Without good communication to your chain of command it makes it impossible for your leaders to communicate to their superiors about problems or issues that you or others may be having. The National Joint. It is also to inform the parties that may be what I feel loyalty, dedicated service and also my interpretation of Military bearing and Discipline.
I am explaining the importance of obeying a lawful order from an NCO and performing that order in a timely manner. The NCO support channel is not an.
The Army uses many different regulations that cover the way it runs its organization to ensure it maintains and improves the way it is managed. With out the chain of command there would be no real order in how we as a whole work. The purpose of the chain of command is to tell people what they can and cannot do.
In the traditional chain of command, if you look at relationships pictorially presented on an organizational chart, the president or CEO is the top employee in the chain of command. This person's directly reporting staff would occupy the second line of the chart, and so forth down through the reporting relationships in an organization.
At each level of the organization moving down the chain of command, the power to make meaningful decisions is diminished. This hierarchical method for organizing information flow, decision making, power, and authority, assumes that each level of the organization is subordinate to the level to which it reports. Terminology like a "subordinate" to refer to reporting employees and "superior" to refer to employees others report to, such as managers , are part of traditional hierarchical language and thinking.
These terms are increasingly not being used as much, as a move to more egalitarian workplaces is the norm. Larger organizations are more prone to using this terminology. Command and control are intrinsic in the chain of command within organizations. The further up the chain of command your job is located, the more power, authority, and usually responsibility and accountability you have. Traditional hierarchical structures have pluses and minuses about how they work in organizations.
The hierarchical order may still exist for ease of organization and reporting relationships, as laid out in a chain of command on an organizational chart. But, the lines and the former rigidity are blurred. In the past, if an employee circumvented his or her boss in favor of talking with the boss's boss, the employee received clear communication that the chain of command was in place for a purpose. While organizations still retain some of its vestiges, the chain of command is much more difficult to enforce when information is so freely circulating and communication is so easy with any member of the organization.
The span of control of an individual manager has become broader, with more reporting employees than in the past. This change forces the manager to allow more autonomy.
Technology has blurred the hierarchy further since information is available all of the time to any employee. Many organizations are experiencing the value of decentralized decision making.
Instructions flow downward along the chain of command and accountability flows upward. According to its proponent Henri Fayol (), the more clear cut the chain of command, the more effective the decision making process and greater the efficiency. Military forces are an. In an organizational structure, “chain of command” refers to a company's hierarchy of reporting relationships – from the bottom to the top of an organization, who must answer to whom. The chain of command not only establishes accountability, it lays out a company’s lines of.
Within the concept of the chain of command, position power still plays a role in organizations. The chain of command in Army basic training runs from the lowest ranking recruit you all the way to the President of the United States. Simply, the Army basic training chain of command is as follows:. As with all military organizations, Air Force basic training also has a designated chain of command:.
The Marine Corps basic training chain of command is a bit tricky because there is no Department of the Marine Corps. While technically a separate branch of the U. Military, operationally the Marine Corps falls under the command and control of the Department of the Navy. The Marine Corps basic training chain of command is as follows:. While the Coast Guard like the Navy is a seagoing service, the Coast Guard basic training chain of command is somewhat different from the Navy basic training chain of command:.
Join the Military. Basic Training Chain of Command. Basic Training Chain of Command Everyone in the military has a chain of command. Related Topics Join the Military.